« November 2008 | Main | January 2009 »

December 2008 Archives

December 2, 2008

What a surprise- we are officially in a recession now!

"What is the good of being a genius if you cannot use it as an excuse for being unemployed?" Gerald Barzan

Today's announcement by the business cycle dating committee that United States has entered a recession late last year shouldn't have surprised anyone?! Except it actually did!? Despite all of the media speculation about the official start date being the third quarter of 2008 because of the "two negative quarters rule", NBER has confirmed what I and many others have said many times already- we have been in a recession for almost a year now!

"The committee determined that a peak in economic activity occurred in the U.S. economy in December 2007. The peak marks the end of the expansion that began in November 2001 and the beginning of a recession. The expansion lasted 73 months; the previous expansion of the 1990s lasted 120 months"

The main remaining question now is simply trying to determine how long this recession will last? I personally believe that GDP will likely contract all the way through July-August 2009 and will start flattening out around the later part of Q3 2009. I picked this date for many reasons, with the main one being the fact that y-o-y comparisons for virtually every sector of the US economy will get much easier around late July 2009 and CPI (price levels) should also help a lot, which will likely lead to the real GDP flattening out around that time before resuming a below trend growth. I also believe that we will start seeing the first real effects of the upcoming stimulus plans around the world, not earlier than third quarter of next year due to the political and implementation lags.

"A recession is a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months, normally visible in production, employment, real income, and other indicators. A recession begins when the economy reaches a peak of activity and ends when the economy reaches its trough. Between trough and peak, the economy is in an expansion.

Because a recession is a broad contraction of the economy, not confined to one sector, the committee emphasizes economy-wide measures of economic activity. The committee believes that domestic production and employment are the primary conceptual measures of economic activity.

The committee views the payroll employment measure, which is based on a large survey of employers, as the most reliable comprehensive estimate of employment. This series reached a peak in December 2007 and has declined every month since then"

This also means that unemployment rate could reach much higher levels than 7-8% currently projected by most economists and the media, as payroll tend to shrink for at least several quarters beyond the "official recession end date"

"Q: What about the unemployment rate? A: Unemployment is generally a lagging indicator, particularly after the trough in economic activity determined by the NBER. For instance, the unemployment rate peaked 15 months after the NBER trough month in the 1990-91 recession and 19 months after the NBER trough month in the 2001 recession. The unemployment rate (which the committee does not use) tends to lag behind employment (which the committee does use) on account of variations in labor-force participation"

Given the fact that S&P has posted one of the worst declines in history today, it seems as if many of the market participants haven't yet discounted the upcoming "bad payroll and recession news". And while today's decline was somewhat expected due to the month-end mark up performed last week, I was still somewhat surprised by the magnitude of it, and thus while my twelve months S&P target expectation is still unchanged at 850+/- 50 points, I am now only buying individual stocks by selling puts instead of making outright purchases...

Stay safe out there; I will post several links and excerpts from two of my most recent Motley Fool articles, including some screener generated ideas in the industrial and technology sectors during the next few days.

skepticalcapitalist@gmail.com

Screening for Stocks on Half Off Sale

As promised below are some excerpts from another CAPS screening article on Motley Fool. As I mentioned before my goal is to prove that you can beat the market by using free internet tools instead of expensive research.

I've started tracking the results of my first 3 screens and so far 85% are ahead of the S&P. Please feel free to check out the latest one!


In my opinion, too many value investors out there still mistakenly believe that a 50% slash in a stock's price means they must be getting a good deal. Recent continued declines in the "deep value" sectors have exposed the dangerous flaw in this strategy.

Single-digit P/Es and "dirt cheap" prices do not equal value. Look at former dry-bulk-shipping darlings like DryShips (Nasdaq: DRYS) and Genco Shipping (NYSE: GNK), which were cut in half between their late-2007 peak and early 2008. After a brief recovery in mid-2008, they have proceeded to decline precipitously, despite being touted by many as deep values with great dividend yields. So much for the "simply buy low P/E stocks" mantra.

Investors who bought DryShips after the initial 50%-off sale have proceeded to lose an additional 90% of their investment, assuming they've held on thus far. Our Motley Fool CAPS screener could have helped you avoid making such a mistake. Despite its unquestionable "hotness" in 2007, DryShips has never carried an "investment-grade" rating in the minds of the CAPS community, topping out at a paltry two stars over the past two years. At best, that rating represents the upper levels of the CAPS "junk status."

Specifically, the following screen sought:

* CAPS ratings of three to four stars on June 2, 2008, around the market's summer high
* Recent CAPS rating of four to five stars.
* Market cap of $500 million to $50 billion.
* Debt/equity ratios of 20% or less.
* Share price between 50% and 80% below the 52-week high.

Five names have made the cut:

Obviously this is not in any way a recommendation but rather simply an example of how to use the free tools out there to generate ideas.

Stay safe out there, skepticalcapitalist@gmail.com

December 8, 2008

What started with Bear Sterns might stop with Bank of America

"Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof"
John Kenneth Galbraith

Warning- this is a very long post :)

Collapse of the two Bear Sterns subprime debt focused hedge funds during the summer days of 2007 is now widely considered to be the "unofficial" start of the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. This financial tsunami that unfolded since then, has already forced numerous financial institutions to the either vanish completely (WaMu, Lehman, Bear Sterns) or to accept "quasi" nationalization (AIG, C, FNM and FRE). It has also led to severe pain and suffering by shareholders of virtually every financial company out there.

And with the latest "government bailout/nationalization" of Citigroup still making headlines around the world, attention of the skeptical short selling crowd has turned towards the next "potential victim"- Bank of America. Blogs and message boards all around the World Wide Web have been filled with various modification of the "Is BofA next?" headline. I don't usually comment on individual companies but given the significance this development for the entire domestic financial industry, I simply could not resist... (Full disclosure- for whatever its worth, I have recently decided to align my bets on the side of Ken Lewis and Co, albeit in the form of the "safer" preferred stock investment as opposed to the common stock one.)

Continue reading "What started with Bear Sterns might stop with Bank of America" »

December 9, 2008

Is buy and hold investing dead or alive?

There seems to be a pretty lively argument unfolding in the Strategy Lab between John Reese and Andrew Horowitz about the viability of "buy and hold" strategy over the long run...

I thought instead of me offering an opinion I'll just direct you to a great short article from WSJ. I think one paragraph there (the first one)- answers the question brilliantly :) Just look what these same guys where saying when they were only 30% down!


Among the hedge funds with the biggest losses through November is the 788 China Fund, whose returns were down about 95% year-to-date. It was up 115% at the end of 2007, making it one of the best.

"Only the one who sells loses money," the fund's managers, Jacques Mechelany and Benjamin Grenier, said in June of this year, when the fund was down 31%. He who sells, they said, "prevents his own self to ride the unavoidable extremes and volatility of markets that are temporarily disconnected from the reality of fundamentals and benefit from the very strong rebound once the fundamentals come back to the fore."

The punch line is quite simply-"unavoidable extremes" can kill you faster than "timing the market". Those who don't ever sell - could also lose your money fast!

P.S. John Reese though is not a true "buy and holder". He rebalances very frequently which in my opinion is the right thing to do.

Stay safe, skepticalcapitalist@gmail.com

December 10, 2008

Six More Screening Ideas (Industrials)

As promised below are some excerpts from another CAPS screening article on Motley Fool. As I mentioned before my goal is to prove that you can beat the market by using free internet tools instead of expensive research. So far so good- 80% of my picks are in the money...

Check out the most recent one


The TV has probably informed you on many occasions that all "manufacturing is dead in America" -- and that soon, we won't even have any factories left here in the United States. With the Big Three automakers' plea for a huge government bailout still dominating the news, these claims will likely only get louder in the short run. But surprisingly enough, according to a 2006 report by the National Association of Manufacturers, U.S. manufacturing all on its own would still represent the world's eighth-largest economy!

Producing tangible goods instead of trading financial papers has somehow become both lower-paid and less desirable for American workers. Very few newly minted Ivy League MBAs now consider Ford or GM a dream destination; instead, they spend most of their job-hunting efforts trying to land the corner office on Wall Street.

But with the giant stimulus package coming out, and the with the U.S. dollar still relatively weak compared to its peak levels of 2000 to 2001, the tide seems to be turning away from less tangible sectors like investment banking, and toward companies that actually make and sell goods. This transition won't happen overnight, but we might all be surprised one day to find "production manager" as high on an MBA's wish list as "investment banker" is today

Specifically, the following screen sought:
* Sector: Industrial goods
* Top CAPS ratings of four or five stars
* Market cap of $150 million to $50 billion
* Low debt/equity ratios of 0 to 0.5 times
* EPS Growth rate (last 3 years) > 10%
* Four-week price change of more than 1%

Six names have made the cut:

Obviously this is not in any way a recommendation but rather simply an example of how to use the free tools out there to generate ideas.

Stay safe out there, skepticalcapitalist@gmail.com

December 12, 2008

Global View- Money Show Interview


Excerpts from my interview for the Global Money Show

Q. Do you think any global markets have bottomed?

A. It is quite possible we will retest the lows from November at some point during the next six months. However, I won't be surprised if a year from now, the Standard & Poor's 500 is trading at around the same level of 850+/- 75 points. This in turn means that many of the buy and hold-investors could once again be left with a disappointing outcome.

Q. Your portfolio for the MSN Strategy Lab includes several telecom companies around the world. Why did you pick them?

A. Mobile telecoms all around the world have been pummeled without really giving any consideration to the fact that cell phones in the emerging countries are no longer a discretionary item--they are somewhat of a consumer staple and thus are not prone to significant declines.

Enterprise values of two to three times earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) for Mobile Telesystems (NYSE: MBT), Turkcell Ilet New (NYSE: TKC), NII Holdings (Nasdaq: NIHD), and Millicom International Cellular (Nasdaq: MICC) are simply ridiculous. Even Israeli cell phone players like Partner Communications (Nasdaq: PTNR) and Cellcom Israel (NYSE: CEL)--some of the most stable and well-managed companies in the telecom space--are selling at four to five times EBITDA.

Continue reading "Global View- Money Show Interview" »

December 15, 2008

Ultra Short ETFs as new WMDs of Wall Street

An interesting article in WSJ about the impact of Ultra Short ETFs on all the wild swings we have seen recently during the afternoon trading...

The final hour of trading has become significantly more active. In November, an average 26.2% of trading volume in the stocks in the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index took place in the final hour and 17.1% in the last 30 minutes, according to data from Credit Suisse. That's a much higher share than before: In 2006 and 2007, 20.7% occurred in the last hour and 12.9% in the last half hour.

This surge in trading has come amid big moves in prices. In many days, prices have been moving three or four percentage points in the last hour -- moves that not very long ago would have been extreme for an entire day

On the surface the theory the author is promoting seems a little weak as compared to the normal margin call/ hedge fund liquidation theory, but on the other hand it also makes sense.

Michael O'Rourke, market strategist at brokerage BTIG LLC, says ETF trading helps explain why there have been so many days where an up or down move suddenly picked up speed for no apparent reason. Their trading activity "reinforces a trend once it starts in motion," he says. Will Weinstein, chairman of Conifer Securities, believes trading connected to the ETFs is "the primary source of volatility in stocks covered by these levered ETFs by a lot." These funds, he says, "are making an already unstable environment much, much worse
"Double" selling pressure explanation makes sense given the fact that the purchase of Ultra Short ETFs implies a "sale" to begin with.
What's more, both the levered short and long ETFs create trading in the same direction. Here's how: Take a bull market ETF designed to deliver twice the returns when stocks move higher. Starting with a base value of $100 per share, a broker who sells the ETF to a client will have an exposure to the market of $200. If the market falls 10%, the value of the ETF falls 20% to $80 and the broker's exposure falls to $180 once the market's move is factored in. To square the books, the broker sells $20 of the underlying stocks at the end of the day. Then consider $100 of a double-leveraged bear market fund, which leaves a dealer with $200 worth of short exposure. If the market falls 10%, the fund rises in value by 20% to $120. The dealer's short exposure is now $180 once the market's move is factored in. As a result, the dealer must sell $60 to get back in line.

To sum it up- Ultra Short ETFs are not only dangerous long term holdings for individual investors due to the compounding and slippage issues (magnifying losses when trend turns the other way due to pure statistical fact of daily double return requirement) but might be also introducing another "black box" into the "already" crowded "Wall Street's "weapons of mass destructions arsenal"...

Stay safe out there and please be careful when using Ultra Shorts as a long term hedge, skepticalcapitalist@gmail.com


December 23, 2008

Happy holidays cheers!!!

This joke should explain the credit crisis for anyone who was still wondering how we got there :) Don't know who the author is :)

"Young Chuck moved to Texas and bought a donkey from a farmer for $100.00. The farmer agreed to deliver the donkey the next day. The next day he drove up and said, 'Sorry son, but I have some bad news, the donkey died.'

Chuck replied, 'Well, then just give me my money back.' The farmer said, 'Can't do that. I went and spent it already.' Chuck said, 'OK, then, just bring me the dead donkey.' The farmer asked, 'What ya gonna do with him? Chuck said, 'I'm going to raffle him off.'

The farmer said 'You can't raffle off a dead donkey!' Chuck said, 'Sure I can Watch me. I just won't tell anybody he's dead.' A month later, the farmer met up with Chuck and asked, 'What happened with that dead donkey?'

Chuck said, 'I raffled him off. I sold 500 tickets at two dollars apiece and made a profit of $898.00.' The farmer said, 'Didn't anyone complain?' Chuck said, 'Just the guy who won. So I gave him his two dollars back.'

Chuck now works for Goldman Sachs."

Merry Christmas Everyone!!!

December 31, 2008

Happy New Year!

May this year mark the beginning of a year of pleasure and discovery for you. May each day hold something special, that is wonderful and new...

For you deserve the best of everything, that life can ever bring!!! Below is the image from Slate that sums it up!

content.cartoonbox.slate.com.gif

P.S. Lot's of new things are coming to my blog during the New Year. I am now in the process of completing my registered investment advisor registration which will allow me to share my investment ideas closer to real time!

P.S.S. Yes, my "real" life fund ended the year in the GREEN in 2008 despite it being started during the worst possible year since 1930s! Cheers and stay safe!